Love you so much, Margaret Atwood. To my mind, ORYX AND CRAKE was and is the best dystopian/utopian novel ever written. How come it didn't receive the same attention (or more) as THE HANDMAID'S TALE? Its time will come. Give it some time, and everything you ever wrote will come true.
When you see a novel receive attention like _The Handmaid's Tale_ you know that it has, as the cliché goes, 'touched a nerve' with the larger non-reading public. My theory is that HT touched the nerve of 'I had a Christian upbringing, and it was bad for me, and I am rejecting Christianity with the full force of my moral being', and 'opposing the Church is the ultimate expression of rationality, or morality, or both' and a host of other related ideas. _Oryx and Crake_ is about a disaster caused by pharmaceutical engineering. Up until very recently, I thought the chances of that book touching a nerve was extremely low. It was a book for people who like reading and like exercising their imaginations, and very much too nerdy for general consumption outside in the non-reading public. Now, I do not know. If it turns out that taking the mRNA covid injections have a long term effect on people's fertility, or health then -- I predict that Oryx and Crake will have a new strong upsurge in sales as people look to art to make sense of their lives. Then will come a made-for-tv movie ....
Except that Atwood the citizen rejects the notion that the Covid era should be viewed as an episode in her book. She’s a staunch Covid affirmationist (as opposed to the much demonized “denialists” amongst us, myself included).
It did receive some loving attention. The National Ballet of Canada created a ballet, MaddAddam, a powerful work of art transforming words to movement and sound and projected image.
I happened to be starting the last book of the Oryx and Crake trilogy when the world shut down for the Covid-19 pandemic in March 2020. It felt eerily appropriate.
My guess would be that it's because it's SF - & very good SF at that - & the publishing industry doesn't seem to cope well with genre novels by established non-genre writers.
Atwood is and always has been a genre writer. Her first novel, for example, The Edible Woman, is a Bildungsroman; sub-genre, Künstlerroman. Think of James Joyce, (Also Sylvia Plath, Willa Cather, others) but A Portrait of the Artist as a Young *Woman, instead (e.g. McAlpin, creator of scrummy woman in the form of a cake, she herself created in the form of a delicious narrative, both of which whet appetites in eaters and readers, both of which are gobbled up, voraciously.) She must be amused that no-one seems to have noticed this even now, fifty (plus) years later. But once you see it you can't unsee it. Elsewhere she describes her second novel, Surfacing, as a ghost story. Cat's eye is another kunstlerroman though not of the coming of age sort. Rather it is a retrospective of an artist's (Risley) young life from mi-career and middle age.
Atwood was (and is) a serious scholar of literature (high, middle, and low brow) and knows its history, forms, genres, rhymes, reasons, even obscure poetic meters. Of course she uses genre. Moreover, she knows she's using it. Its fundamental to her work. The publishing industry seems to have done quite well with her genre novels.
I could not agree more. I read Orx and Crake aged 16, one of few compulsary reads I've ever truly adored... and every re-read, I find some other stark reflection of contemporary society speculated by Atwood.
About ten years ago I wrote you a letter and you were so kind to respond back (we corresponded a few times), recommending Negotiating With the Dead to me along with a signed bookmark. Your words about writing and reading were so encouraging - thank you for your kindness!
What a god damn DELIGHT to get this from you, direct to my inbox! Thank you. Lots to think on here and I love the idea of tone being the musical key, hadn't thought of it that way before.
If only it were that simple. Too much thought and it's about as inspiring as cold gruel. Too little, and it meanders into incoherency. Some people's brains make the coolest connections, and out pops a weave of layered OMG. I stand in awe of those who are wired this way. They are word shamans and enchanters. (Yes Ms. Atwood, you are one of these, and we love you for it.)
I'll keep a link to this page to remind me of your basic basics. (I am approaching retirement, and always wanted to be a brain surgeon; uh, I mean writer.)
Thank you for the advice! I am writing a novel now and I find that a big part is getting to know the genre and what you call "the musical key". I am a big fan of your work and I am so glad you have a platform here!
Love you Peggy. You make us proud to be Canadians, with no qualifiers.🕊️
This is a big ✅ for Substack as a quality value creation platform. I look forward to learning from your insight. The world desperately needs creative, inspiring and original stories.
Something that happens to be a qualified expertise of yours. Thank you.🙏❤️
My earlier comments have disappeared so here goes again. Thank you for the insight into writing novels. I am a reader of novels and love reading yours. I also thoroughly enjoy Handmaid’s Tale adapted for tv. Usually I am disappointed after reading the book but not in this case. Well done.
Well, at least you know 2 people who will be reading every installment - you and yourself, lol! I love it! This one was very informative and encouraging. Thank you.
Between yours Chuck Palahniuk’s substack, this is the most encouraged I’ve been in all of my writing life.
I agree!
The name should give you leeway. 😸
Love you so much, Margaret Atwood. To my mind, ORYX AND CRAKE was and is the best dystopian/utopian novel ever written. How come it didn't receive the same attention (or more) as THE HANDMAID'S TALE? Its time will come. Give it some time, and everything you ever wrote will come true.
When you see a novel receive attention like _The Handmaid's Tale_ you know that it has, as the cliché goes, 'touched a nerve' with the larger non-reading public. My theory is that HT touched the nerve of 'I had a Christian upbringing, and it was bad for me, and I am rejecting Christianity with the full force of my moral being', and 'opposing the Church is the ultimate expression of rationality, or morality, or both' and a host of other related ideas. _Oryx and Crake_ is about a disaster caused by pharmaceutical engineering. Up until very recently, I thought the chances of that book touching a nerve was extremely low. It was a book for people who like reading and like exercising their imaginations, and very much too nerdy for general consumption outside in the non-reading public. Now, I do not know. If it turns out that taking the mRNA covid injections have a long term effect on people's fertility, or health then -- I predict that Oryx and Crake will have a new strong upsurge in sales as people look to art to make sense of their lives. Then will come a made-for-tv movie ....
Except that Atwood the citizen rejects the notion that the Covid era should be viewed as an episode in her book. She’s a staunch Covid affirmationist (as opposed to the much demonized “denialists” amongst us, myself included).
It did receive some loving attention. The National Ballet of Canada created a ballet, MaddAddam, a powerful work of art transforming words to movement and sound and projected image.
Oh, wow - I need to check it out. Thanks, Howard.
I happened to be starting the last book of the Oryx and Crake trilogy when the world shut down for the Covid-19 pandemic in March 2020. It felt eerily appropriate.
My guess would be that it's because it's SF - & very good SF at that - & the publishing industry doesn't seem to cope well with genre novels by established non-genre writers.
Atwood is and always has been a genre writer. Her first novel, for example, The Edible Woman, is a Bildungsroman; sub-genre, Künstlerroman. Think of James Joyce, (Also Sylvia Plath, Willa Cather, others) but A Portrait of the Artist as a Young *Woman, instead (e.g. McAlpin, creator of scrummy woman in the form of a cake, she herself created in the form of a delicious narrative, both of which whet appetites in eaters and readers, both of which are gobbled up, voraciously.) She must be amused that no-one seems to have noticed this even now, fifty (plus) years later. But once you see it you can't unsee it. Elsewhere she describes her second novel, Surfacing, as a ghost story. Cat's eye is another kunstlerroman though not of the coming of age sort. Rather it is a retrospective of an artist's (Risley) young life from mi-career and middle age.
Atwood was (and is) a serious scholar of literature (high, middle, and low brow) and knows its history, forms, genres, rhymes, reasons, even obscure poetic meters. Of course she uses genre. Moreover, she knows she's using it. Its fundamental to her work. The publishing industry seems to have done quite well with her genre novels.
Oryx and Crake is my favorite too.
I could not agree more. I read Orx and Crake aged 16, one of few compulsary reads I've ever truly adored... and every re-read, I find some other stark reflection of contemporary society speculated by Atwood.
Must read. Cats eye was my favourite and convinced me she was a great novelist. That touched a nerve for me.
About ten years ago I wrote you a letter and you were so kind to respond back (we corresponded a few times), recommending Negotiating With the Dead to me along with a signed bookmark. Your words about writing and reading were so encouraging - thank you for your kindness!
Anywhere Margaret Atwood shows up it's going to be a party. Some fun, a few drinks, some argument and something elucidating. So happy to hop on board!
Several years ago I saw Atwood give a talk in Cooperstown NY. Also in the audience was late great RBG.
❤️
What a god damn DELIGHT to get this from you, direct to my inbox! Thank you. Lots to think on here and I love the idea of tone being the musical key, hadn't thought of it that way before.
🔥
So what do I write?
"Words, words, words" - Hamlet Act II scene ii.
If only it were that simple. Too much thought and it's about as inspiring as cold gruel. Too little, and it meanders into incoherency. Some people's brains make the coolest connections, and out pops a weave of layered OMG. I stand in awe of those who are wired this way. They are word shamans and enchanters. (Yes Ms. Atwood, you are one of these, and we love you for it.)
I'll keep a link to this page to remind me of your basic basics. (I am approaching retirement, and always wanted to be a brain surgeon; uh, I mean writer.)
Thank you for the advice! I am writing a novel now and I find that a big part is getting to know the genre and what you call "the musical key". I am a big fan of your work and I am so glad you have a platform here!
Love you Peggy. You make us proud to be Canadians, with no qualifiers.🕊️
This is a big ✅ for Substack as a quality value creation platform. I look forward to learning from your insight. The world desperately needs creative, inspiring and original stories.
Something that happens to be a qualified expertise of yours. Thank you.🙏❤️
🔥
Thank you for reminding me of the basics. It's so easy to get lost in the details...
Definitely
My earlier comments have disappeared so here goes again. Thank you for the insight into writing novels. I am a reader of novels and love reading yours. I also thoroughly enjoy Handmaid’s Tale adapted for tv. Usually I am disappointed after reading the book but not in this case. Well done.
"Oh look! I added button." She ain't a genius for nuttin.
Thanks to you for pointing to the important stuff.
And for your wonderful novels which embody all the important stuff.
Fabulous illustrations!
I learn so much, and I find so much encouraged when I read an Author's newsletter. I will save this and use it as a reference.
🔥
Well, at least you know 2 people who will be reading every installment - you and yourself, lol! I love it! This one was very informative and encouraging. Thank you.
Lol
Oh this is just so good - MAGIC- to see you here on substack - and I too subscribed to my own x2 so now receive it three times over.
🔥